Enemigo wrote:If someone gets in contact, find out how much to buy the site. Even if no one does, it'd be nice to know.
Great idea. If they're honest (?) it's not making them any profit anyway.
Jack
Moderator: Staff
Enemigo wrote:If someone gets in contact, find out how much to buy the site. Even if no one does, it'd be nice to know.
SRN wrote:Vertical Scope got back to me when I asked how much to buy it, $25,000. Which is about what I anticipated.
JoeIsuzu wrote:SRN wrote:Vertical Scope got back to me when I asked how much to buy it, $25,000. Which is about what I anticipated.
Absolutely preposterous. They contributed WHAT to the site that would justify that kind of profit? ZERO.
The only possible reason to price it that high is because they think someone might actually want it.
It would be amusing if everyone just removed all their posts, and left these greedy yahoos high and dry, with only the content THEY contributed (ZERO).
mudoilngears wrote:JoeIsuzu wrote:SRN wrote:Vertical Scope got back to me when I asked how much to buy it, $25,000. Which is about what I anticipated.
Absolutely preposterous. They contributed WHAT to the site that would justify that kind of profit? ZERO.
The only possible reason to price it that high is because they think someone might actually want it.
It would be amusing if everyone just removed all their posts, and left these greedy yahoos high and dry, with only the content THEY contributed (ZERO).
That, or they paid a substantial amount for it, and want their investment back.
JoeIsuzu wrote:If not for the load of collected knowledge that's here (contributed by AutoGuide: 0%; members: 100%), I'd vote to start over with a new site.
Jack
JoeIsuzu wrote:Absolutely preposterous. They contributed WHAT to the site that would justify that kind of profit? ZERO.
The only possible reason to price it that high is because they think someone might actually want it.
It would be amusing if everyone just removed all their posts, and left these greedy yahoos high and dry, with only the content THEY contributed (ZERO).
JoeIsuzu wrote:I got the impression they took it off Tad's hands for nothing but a promise to maintain it, in return for the ad revenue.
SRN wrote:I’m in touch with someone at VS. they say they’re willing to make a couple of us Mods. Just waiting to hear back on that.
JoeIsuzu wrote:SRN wrote:I’m in touch with someone at VS. they say they’re willing to make a couple of us Mods. Just waiting to hear back on that.
The more they can get done for free, the less it will cost them. There really isn't a polite term to describe how they'll be taking advantage of moderators.
Jack
mudoilngears wrote:They’d probably just disable signatures.
JoeIsuzu wrote:mudoilngears wrote:They’d probably just disable signatures.
You're assuming they're even paying attention?![]()
jack
JoeIsuzu wrote:SRN wrote:I’m in touch with someone at VS. they say they’re willing to make a couple of us Mods. Just waiting to hear back on that.
The more they can get done for free, the less it will cost them. There really isn't a polite term to describe how they'll be taking advantage of moderators.
Jack
SRN wrote:Looks like they listened! I got Moderator access today.
mudoilngears, if you're still interested they're willing to give you the rights as well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests